A qualitative exploration of the impact of covid-19 pandemic on research in health professions
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on research in health professions.
METHODS: It was a qualitative case study. Semi-structured interviews were done with researchers who were selected through purposive sampling. After thirteen interviews, data saturation was achieved. The interviews were recorded on zoom, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed manually for codes, categories, and themes.
RESULTS: This study explored the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health research through interviews with researchers, revealing three major themes and thirteen subthemes. The themes encompass the challenges encountered by researchers, the research opportunities provided by the pandemic, and modifications in ongoing and planned projects. All participants expressed that the pandemic brought numerous hurdles, including reduced research opportunities, challenges in data collection, small sample sizes, quality assurance concerns, and delays in project completion. However, it also offered silver linings such as the development of new competencies, a shift in research priorities, and increased reliance on virtual platforms for collaboration and data collection. These findings highlight both the obstacles and innovations prompted by the pandemic in health research.
CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted health research, acting as a catalyst for innovation, particularly through the increased use of digital tools and virtual platforms. While researchers faced substantial challenges like disruptions in methodologies and project timelines, these adaptations may persist as integral elements of the research paradigm in health professions, guiding future policy and practice beyond the pandemic.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online
(e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
1. Corson TW, Hawkins SM, Sanders E, Byram J, Cruz LA, Olson J, et al. Building a virtual summer research experience in cancer for high school and early undergraduate students: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ 2021;21(1):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02861-y
2. Moises C, Torrentia Jr. Online data collection as adaptation in conducting quantitative and qualitative research during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Eur J Edu Stud 2020;7(11):78-87. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3336
3. Chahrour M, Assi S, Bejjani M, Nasrallah AA, Salhab H, Fares MY, et al. A Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research activity: A call for increased output. Cureus. 2020;12(3):1-8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7357
4. Kent P, Keating J, Bernhardt J, Carroll S, Hill K, McBurney H. Evidence-based practice. Aust J Physiother 1999;45(3):167-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60347-0
5. Yazdizadeh B, Majdzadeh R, Ahmadi A, Mesgarpour B. Health research system resilience: lesson learned from the COVID-19 crisis. Heal Res Policy Syst 2020;18(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00667-w
6. Elsevier BV.Research and higher education in the time of COVID-19. Lancet 2020;396(10251):583. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31818-3
7. Fernandes L, FitzPatrick ME, Roycrof M. The role of the future physician: building on shifting sands. Clin Med 2020;20(3):285-9. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmed.2020-0030
8. Ruiz-Real JL, Nievas-Soriano BJ, Uribe-Toril J. Has Covid-19 gone viral? An overview of research by subject area. Health Educ Behav 2020;47(6):861-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120958368
9. Yanow SK, Good MF. Nonessential research in the new normal: The impact of COVID-19. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020;102(6):1164-5. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0325
10. O’Brien BC, Teherani A, Boscardin CK, O’Sullivan PS. Pause, persist, pivot: Key decisions health professions education researchers must make about conducting studies during extreme events. Acad Med 2020;95(11):1634-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003535
11. Bratan T, Aichinger H, Brkic N, Rueter J, Apfelbacher C, Boyer L, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ongoing health research: An ad hoc survey among investigators in Germany. BMJ Open 2021;11(12):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049086
12. Pezzullo AM, Ioannidis JPA, Boccia S. Quality, integrity and utility of COVID-19 science: opportunities for public health researchers. Eur J Public Health 2023;33(2):157-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac183
13. Priya A. Case Study Methodology of Qualitative Research: Key Attributes and Navigating the Conundrums in Its Application. Sociological Bull 2021;70(1):94-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022920970318
14. Naz N, Gulab F, Aslam M. Development of Qualitative Semi-Structured Interview Guide for Case Study Research. Competitive Soc Sci Res J 2022;3(2):42-52. https://cssrjournal.com/index.php/cssrjournal/article/view/170
15. Braun V, Clarke V, Hayfield N, Terry G. Thematic analysis. In: Liamputtong P ed, Handbook of research methods in health social sciences Springer, Singapore. 2018;843-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2779-6_103-1
16. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care 2007;19(6):349-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
17. Omary MB, Eswaraka J, Kimball SD, Moghe PV, Panettieri RA, Scotto KW. The COVID-19 pandemic and research shutdown: Staying safe and productive. J Clin Invest 2020;130(6):2745-8. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI138646
18. Cardel MI, Manasse S, Krukowski RA, Ross K, Shakour R, Miller DR, et al. COVID-19 impacts mental health outcomes and ability/desire to participate in research among current research participants. Obesity 2020;28(12):2272-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.23016
19. Kalanj K, Marshall R, Karol K, Tiljak MK, Orešković S. The Impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions in Croatia. Front Public Health 2021;9:720948. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.720948
20. Hensen B, Mackworth-Young CRS, Simwinga M, Abdelmagid N, Banda J, Mavodza C, et al. Remote data collection for public health research in a COVID-19 era: ethical implications, challenges and opportunities. Health Policy Plan 2021;36(3):360-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa158
21. Barroga E, Matanguihan GJ. Fundamental shifts in research, ethics and peer review in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Korean Med Sci 2020;35(45):e395. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e395
22. Zdravkovic M, Berger-Estilita J, Zdravkovic B, Berger D. Scientific quality of COVID-19 and SARS CoV-2 publications in the highest impact medical journals during the early phase of the pandemic: A case-control study. PLoS One 2020;15(11):e0241826. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241826
23. Sethi BA, Sethi A, Ali S, Aamir HS. Impact of Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic on health professionals. Pak J Med Sci 2020;36(COVID19-S4):S6-11. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.COVID19-S4.2779
24. Purvis M. Learning to love-virtual conferences. Nature 2020;582:135-6. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-020-01489-0
25. Mahboob U, Sherin A. Future of online medical education. Khyber Med Univ J 2020;12(3):175-6. https://doi.org/10.35845/kmuj.2020.20753
26. Torrentira MC, J. Online data collection as adaptation in conducting quantitative and qualitative research during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Eur J Educ Stud 2020;7(11):78-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3336