Main Article Content
OBJECTIVES: to identify the demographic factors that can make recipients vulnerable to develop poorer perceptions of health despite a
healthy graft functioning and to evaluate recipients’ perceived health
status (PHS) influences their coping and adjustment with the altered
life styles and challenges after transplant.
METHODS: In this longitudinal study, PHS was measured by a self-developed questionnaire that reflected the symptoms’ severity and frequency measured by the common immunosuppressant side effects. Actual physical health status was measured by the clinical data that comprised of kidney function tests (serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid) and general health indicators such as blood pressure, cholesterol and haemoglobin levels.
RESULTS: There was significant correlation among sociodemographic
factors and perceptions of health status after a successful renal transplant over time. Age had a significant negative association with PHS, indicating that older recipients tend to have poorer perceptions of health as compared to younger recipients. Single RTRs tend to have more a better PHS than those in a relationship. Time since transplantation showed a significant positive correlation with PHS reflecting that with the passage of time, perceptions of health tend to improve in most RTRs.
In Sociodemographic factors, significant differences were found only
in age and marital status. Older and single recipients tend to report
better PHS. However, PHS did not differ significantly across gender,
educational level, financial and work status.
CONCLUSION: Socio-demographic factors do affect PHS to some extent and thus need to be considered as a part of transplant candidacy and psychological management accordingly.
KEY WORDS: Perceived Health Status (Non-MeSH), Actual Physical
Health Status (Non-MeSH), Renal Transplant Recipients (Non-MeSH),
Socio-demographic (Non-MeSH), Quality of Life (MeSH).
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
of Disease-specific Quality of Life
Measurement Scales. Buckingham: Open
University Press; 2001.
2. Prihodova L, Nagyova I, Rosenberger J,
Roland R, Dijk J, Groothoff J. Impact of
personality and psychological distress
on health -related quality of life in kidney
transplant recipients. Transpl Int
3. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Wolfe RA, Leichtman
AB, Agodoa LY, Port FK. Long-term survival
in renal transplant recipients with graft
function. Kidney Int 2000;57(1):307–13.
4. McCaughan AJ, Patterson CC, Maxwell AP,
Courtney AE. Factors influencing survival
after kidney transplant failure. Transpl Res
5. Siegal B, Halbert RJ, McGuire MJ. Life satisfaction
among kidney transplant recipients:
Demographic and biological factors. Prog
Transpl 2002 Dec;12(4):293-8.
6. Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M, Reeve
J, Einecke G, Sis B, et al. Understanding
the causes of kidney transplant failure:
The dominant role of antibody-mediated
rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transpl
7. Gentile S, Beauger D, Speyer E, Jouve
E, Dussol B, Jacquelinet C, et al. Factors
associated with health related quality of
life in renal transplant recipient: Results of
a national survey in France. Health Qual
Life Outcomes 2013;11(1):88.
8. Dew MA, Switzer GE, Goycoolea JM,
Allen AS, DiMartini A, Kormos RL, et
al. Does transplantation produce quality
of life benefits? A quantitative analysis
of the literature. Transplant 1997 Nov
9. Maglakelidze N, Pantsulaia T, Tchokhonelidze
I, Managadze L, Chkhotua A. Assessment
of health-related quality of life in
renal transplant recipients and dialysis patients.
Transplant Proc. 2011;43(1):376–9.
10. Muehrer RJ, Becker BN. Psychosocial
factors in patients with chronic kidney disease:
Life after transplantation: new transitions
in quality of life and psychological
distress. Semin Dial 2005;18(2):124–131.
11. Goetzmann L, Sarac N, Ambuhl P, Boehlerb
A, Iranib S, Muellhauptb B, et al. Psychological
response and quality of life after
transplantation: A comparison between
heart, lung, liver and kidney recipients.
Swiss Med Wkly 2008 Aug 23;138(33-
34):477-83. doi: 2008/33/smw-12160.
12. Bohlke M, Marini SS, Rocha M, Terhorst
L, Gomes RH, Barcellos FC, et al. Factors
associated with health-related quality of
life after successful kidney transplantation:
A population-based study. Qual Life Res
13. Griva K, Stygall J, Ng JH, Davenport
A, Harrison MJ, Newman S. Prospective
changes in health-related quality
of life and emotional outcomes in
kidney transplantation over 6 years.
J Transplant 2011;2011:671571. doi:
10.1155/2011/671571. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
14. Hodge EE, Goormastic M, Straffon RA,
Novick AC, Streem SB, Goldfarb DA, et al.
Changing demographics in renal transplant
recipients: The 30 year Cleveland Clinic
experience. Clin Transpl 1994; 221-31.
15. de Mendonça AEO, de Vasconcelos Torres
G, de Góes Salvetti M, Alchieri JC, Costa
IKF. Changes in quality of life after kidney
transplantation and related factors. Acta
Paul Enferm 2014;27(3):287-92.
16. Chisholm MA, Spivey CA, Nus AV. Influence
of economic and demographic factors
on quality of life in renal transplant recipients.
Clin Transplant 2007;21(2):285–93.
17. Rizvi SAH, Naqvi, SAA, Zafar MN, Akhtar
SF. A kidney transplantation model in a
low-resource country: an experience from
Pakistan. Kidney Int Suppl (2011)2013
18. Rosenberger J, vanDijk JP, Nagyova I,
Zezula I, Geckova AM, Roland R, et al.
Predictors of perceived health status
in patients after kidney transplantation.