Comparative effects of dry needing and cross friction massage on pain, mobility and functional status in plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of dry needling (DN) and cross-friction massage (CFM) in reducing pain and improving mobility and functional status in patients with plantar fasciitis.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 15 to June 20, 2023, on 48 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Data were collected from Health City Hospital, Tabba Clinic, and Liaqat Physiotherapy Clinic, Lahore-Pakistan. Patients were randomized through lottery method into two groups (n=24 each), receiving either DN or CFM for 8 weeks with 2 sessions per week. Pain, foot health, and functional status were assessed pre- and post-treatment using the Pain Scale for Plantar Fasciitis (PSPF), Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ), and Foot Functional Index (FFI). Data were analyzed using SPSS-22.
Results: Data were nonparametric, comprising 15 males (31.3%) and 33 females (68.7%), with a mean age of 33.9±2.88 years. Both groups showed significant improvements in pain, mobility, and functional status post-intervention (p =0.001 for PSPF, FHSQ, and FFI). However, DN demonstrated greater effectiveness compared to CFM, with higher post-treatment mean ranks for PSPF (85.4 vs. 74.6), FHSQ (88.2 vs. 72.3), and FFI (92.5 vs. 68.5; p < 0.001). Across-group Wilcoxon T test results indicated significant z-score changes (-4.4 to -4.2), and Mann-Whitney U test comparisons showed significant shifts (97.5 to 145.5). The DN group achieved a mean change of 15.44.
Conclusion: DN is more effective than CFM for pain reduction, mobility improvement, and functional enhancement in plantar fasciitis. Further studies with larger, more diverse populations and longer follow-up are recommended.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online
(e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
1. Morrissey D, Cotchett M, Said J'Bari A, Prior T, Griffiths IB, Rathleff MS, et al. Management of plantar heel pain: a best practice guide informed by a systematic review, expert clinical reasoning and patient values. Br J Sports Med 2021;55(19):1106-18. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101970
2. Naterstad IF, Joensen J, Bjordal JM, Couppé C, Lopes-Martins RAB, Stausholm MB. Efficacy of low-level laser therapy in patients with lower extremity tendinopathy or plantar fasciitis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open 2022:28;12(9):e059479. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059479
3. Umar H, Idrees W, Umar W, Khalil A, Rizvi ZA. Impact of routine footwear on foot health: A study on plantar fasciitis. J Family Med Prim Care 2022;11(7):3851-5. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_637_21
4. Holla SS, Srikantaiah S, Debur R. Single Session of Low-dye Calcaneal Taping as a Viable Alternative to LASER Therapy for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery (Asia Pacific) 2022;9(1):31. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10040-1182
5. Cotchett M, Lennecke A, Medica VG, Whittaker GA, Bonanno DR. The association between pain catastrophising and kinesiophobia with pain and function in people with plantar heel pain. Foot (Edinb). 2017;32:8-14.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2017.03.003
6. Martin RL, Davenport TE, Reischl SF, McPoil TG, Matheson JW, Wukich DK, et al. Heel pain-plantar fasciitis: revision 2014. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(11):A1-33.https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2014.0303
7.Sahin N, Oztürk A, Atıcı T. Foot mobility and plantar fascia elasticity in patients with plantar fasciitis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44(5):385-91.https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2010.2348
8. Khired Z, Najmi MH, Akkur AA, Mashhour MA, Bakri KA. The Prevalence and Risk Factors of Plantar Fasciitis amongst the Population of Jazan. Cureus. 2022:21;14(9):e29434. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29434
9. Stoychev V, Finestone AS, Kalichman L. Dry Needling as a Treatment Modality for Tendinopathy: a Narrative Review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020;13(1):133-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-020-09608-0
10. Al-Boloushi Z, Gómez-Trullén EM, Bellosta-López P, López-Royo MP, Fernández D, Herrero P. Comparing two dry needling interventions for plantar heel pain: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Surg Res 2019:25;14(1):31.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1066-4
11. Griswold D, Learman K, Ickert E, Clewley D, Donaldson MB, Wilhelm M, et al. Comparing dry needling or local acupuncture to various wet needling injection types for musculoskeletal pain and disability. A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2024;46(3):414-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2023.2165731
12. Eftekharsadat B, Babaei-Ghazani A, Zeinolabedinzadeh V. Dry needling in patients with chronic heel pain due to plantar fasciitis: A single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2016 :23;30:401.
13. Dunning J, Butts R, Henry N, Mourad F, Brannon A, Rodriguez H, et al. Electrical dry needling as an adjunct to exercise, manual therapy and ultrasound for plantar fasciitis: A multi-center randomized clinical trial. PLoS One. 2018;31;13(10):e0205405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205405
14. Yelverton C, Rama S, Zipfel B. Manual therapy interventions in the treatment of plantar fasciitis: A comparison of three approaches. Health SA.: 25;24:1244. https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v24i0.1244
15. Saein AM, Safavi-Farokhi Z, Aminianfar A, Mortezanejad M. The Effect of Dry Needling on Pain, Range of Motion of Ankle Joint, and Ultrasonographic Changes of Plantar Fascia in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis. J Sport Rehabil 2022:1;31(3):299-304. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0156
16. Rahbar M, Eslamian F, Toopchizadeh V, Jahanjoo F, Kargar A, Dolatkhah N. A comparison of the efficacy of dry-needling and extracorporeal shockwave therapy for plantar fasciitis: a randomized clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2018;20(9):e68908. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.68908
17. Hortz BV, Falsone S. A Multisegmental Approach to Dry Needling Plantar Fasciitis: A Case Study. J Sport Rehabil 2022:1;31(4):490-4. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2021-0385
18. Wheeler PC, Dudson C, Gregory KM, Singh H, Boyd KT. Autologous Blood Injection With Dry-Needling vs Dry-Needling Alone Treatment for Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Foot Ankle Int. 2022;43(5):646-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007211061365
19. Farooq N, Aslam S, Bashir N, Awan WA, Shah M, Irshad A. Effectiveness of transverse friction massage of Flexor digitorum brevis and Calf muscle stretching in Plantar fasciitis on foot function index scale: A randomized control trial. Isra Med J 2019;1(4):305-9.
20. Bagcier F, Yilmaz N. The Impact of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling Combination on Pain and Functionality in the Patients Diagnosed with Plantar Fasciitis. J Foot Ankle Surg 2020;59(4):689-93. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2019.09.038
21. Salehi S, Shadmehr A, Olyaei G, Bashardoust S, Mir SM. Effects of dry needling and stretching exercise versus stretching exercise only on pain intensity, function, and sonographic characteristics of plantar fascia in the subjects with plantar fasciitis: a parallel single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract 2023;39(3):490-503. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2021.2023930