PHYSIOTHERAPISTS’ APPROACH REGARDING SPASTICITY MEASUREMENT SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER MOTOR NEURON SYNDROME

Main Article Content

Junaid Farooq
Muhammad Asif
Hira Islam Rajput
Muhammad Atif Khan
Muhammad Riaz Baig Chughtai
Noman Issani

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the physiotherapists’ approach regarding spasticity measurement scales in patients with upper motor neuron syndrome.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in different hospitals of Karachi from January 2018 to June 2018. One hundred physiotherapists with an interest in the neurological rehabilitation were enrolled by using convenience-sampling technique. After taking written informed consent, a questionnaire comprising of close-ended questions was distributed among the participants. Extraction sheet was used to extract the recorded response; later was analyzed using SPSS v 21.0.
RESULTS: Out of 100 physiotherapists, 90 responded (response rate of 90%), where 60 (66.6%) participants were males and 30 (33.3%) were female. Fifty-five (61.11%) participants responded that they use assessment scale of tone for shoulder complex, seven (7.78%) used biomechanical approaches, five (5.56%) used neurophysiological, three (3.33%) use both biomechanical as well as neurophysiological approach for the assessment of tone in shoulder complex and twenty (22.22%) did not use any measurement scale. Out of 55 participants using any assessment scale, twenty (36.4%) used Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), while rest of thirty-five (63.6%) used three grade muscle tone scale with different combination: mild/moderate/severe] by twenty (36.4%); flaccid/normal/spastic by five (9.1%), and +/++/+++ by ten (18.1%) participants.
CONCLUSION: Majority of participants in this study use unreliable assessment tools for the assessment of tone in upper motor neuron syndrome. They need to be encouraged to use valid and reliable tools for assessment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Farooq, J., M. Asif, H. Rajput, M. Khan, M. Chughtai, and N. Issani. “PHYSIOTHERAPISTS’ APPROACH REGARDING SPASTICITY MEASUREMENT SCALES IN PATIENTS WITH UPPER MOTOR NEURON SYNDROME”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, Vol. 12, no. 2, June 2020, pp. 117-20, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2020.18679.
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Dewey CW, Costa RC. Functional and dysfunctional neuroanatomy: the key to lesion localization.In: A practical guide to canine and feline neurology. 3rd ed. New Zeeland;Wiley-Blackwell:2015. [Accessed on: August 18, 2018]. Available from URL: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Practical+Guide+to+Canine+and+Feline+Neurology%2C+3rd+Edition-p-9781119062042.
2. Eriks-Hoogland I, De Groot S, Snoek G, Stucki G, Post M, Van Der Woude L. Association of shoulder problems in persons with spinal cord injury at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation with activities and participation 5 years later. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.432.
3. Rapidi C, Kyriakides A. People with spinal cord injury in Greece. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2017;96(2):71-3.
4. Turner-Stokes L, Jackson D. Shoulder pain after stroke: a review of the evidence base to inform the development of an integrated care pathway. Clin Rehabil 2002;16(3):276-98. DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr491oa.
5. Donatelli R. Physical Therapy of the Shoulder. 5th ed; Churchill Livingstone: 2012. [Accessed on: August 18, 2018]. Available from URL: https://www.elsevier.com/books/physical-therapy-of-the-shoulder/donatelli/978-1-4377-0740-3.
6. Fotiadis F. Grouios G. Ypsilanti A. Hatzinkolaou K. Hemiplegic shoulder syndrome: possible underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. Phys Ther Rev 2005;10(1):51-8. DOI: 10.1179/108331905X43445.
7. Watkins CL, Leathley MJ, Gregson JM, Moore AP, Smith TL, Sharma AK. Prevalence of spasticity post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002;16(5):515-22. DOI: 10.1191/0269215502cr512oa.
8. Weidner N, Rupp R, Tansey K. Neurological aspects of spinal cord injury. 1st ed. Switzerland; Springer International Publishing:2017. [Accessed on: August 18, 2018]. Available from URL: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783319462912.
9. Pizzi A, Carlucci G, Falsini C, Verdesca S, Grippo A. Evaluation of upper-limb spasticity after stroke: A clinical and neurophysiologic study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86(3):410-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.10.022.
10. Bavikatte G, Gaber T. Approach to spasticity in General practice. Brit J Med Pract 2009;2(3):29-34.
11. Blanchette AK, Demers M, Woo K, Shah A, Solomon JM, Mullick AA, et al. Current practices of physical and occupational therapists regarding spasticity assessment and treatment. Physiother Can 2017;69(4):303-12. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2016-54
12. Li S. Spasticity, motor recovery, and neural plasticity after stroke. Front Neurol 2017;8:120. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00120.
13. Fridén J, Lieber RL. Spastic muscle cells are shorter and stiffer than normal cells. Muscle Nerve 2003; 27(2):157-64. DOI: 10.1002/mus.10247
14. Synnot A, Chau M, Pitt V, O'connor D, Gruen RL, Wasiak J, et al. Interventions for managing skeletal muscle spasticity following traumatic brain injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;11: CD008929. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008929.pub2
15. Bhakta BB. Management of spasticity in stroke. Br Med Bull 2000;56(2):476-85. DOI: 10.1258/0007142001903111.
16. Burridge JH, Wood DE, Hermens HJ, Voerman GE, Johnson GR, Wijck FV, et al. Theoretical and methodological considerations in the measurement of spasticity. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27(1-2):69-80. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400014592
17. Kahn MB, Mentiplay BF, Clark RA, Bower KJ, Williams G. Methods of assessing associated reactions of the upper limb in stroke and traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Brain Inj 2016;30(3):252-66. DOI: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1117657
18. Lo WLA, Zhao JL, Chen L, Lei D, Huang DF, Tong KF. Between-days intra-rater reliability with a hand held myotonometer to quantify muscle tone in the acute stroke population. Sci Rep 2017;7: 14173.
19. De Azevedo ER, Maria RM, Alonso KC, Cliquet JR A. Posture influence on the pendulum test of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Artif Organs 2015;39(12):1033-7. DOI: 10.1111/aor.12500.
20. Sunnerhagen KS, Francisco GE. Enhancing patient–provider communication for long‐term post‐stroke spasticity management. Acta Neurol Scand 2013;128(5):305-10. DOI: 10.1111/ane.12128
21. Adams MM, Hicks AL. Spasticity after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2005;43(10):577-86. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101757.
22. Sæther R, Jørgensen L. Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Trunk Impairment Scale for children with cerebral palsy. Res Dev Disabil 2011;32(2):727-39. DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.007.
23. Lannin NA, Cusick A, Hills C, Kinnear B, Vogel K, Matthews K, Bowring G. Upper limb motor training using a Saebo™ orthosis is feasible for increasing task‐specific practice in hospital after stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2016;63(6):364-72. DOI :10.1111/1440-1630.12330
24. Yam WK, Leung MS. Interrater reliability of Modified Ashworth Scale and Modified Tardieu Scale in children with spastic cerebral palsy. J Child Neurol 2006;21(12):1031-5. DOI: 10.1177/7010.2006.00222.
25. Burchiel KJ, Hsu FP. Pain and spasticity after spinal cord injury: mechanisms and treatment. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26(24S):S146-60. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200112151-00024.
26. Lohmann J, Houlfort N, De Allegri M. Crowding out or no crowding out? A Self-Determination Theory approach to health worker motivation in performance-based financing. Soc Sci Med 2016;169:1-8.DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.006.