COMPARISON OF FIRST YEAR MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS REGARDING THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTITUTIONAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN INTEGRATED VS TRADITIONAL MEDICAL CURRICULUM BY USING DREEM INVENTORY

Main Article Content

Tatheer Zahra
Mohammad Iqbal Khan
Muhammad Umer
Hijab e Zainab

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the first-year medical undergraduates’ perceptions regarding their institutional educational environment in traditional and integrated medical curricula by using the Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM) inventory.


METHODS: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted in 2017-18 at two medical institutions of Rawalpindi and Islamabad labeled as Institution A (with integrated curriculum) and B (with traditional curriculum). After seeking written informed consent, paper format DREEM questionnaire was administered to 100 first year MBBS students. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied.


RESULTS: Mean global DREEM score for institution A was 131.09±19.94 with minimum score of 87 and maximum score of 175. Mean global DREEM score for institution B was 117.11±21.02 with minimum score of 65 and maximum score of 167. These scores reveal a “more positive” environment (scores of 101-150), with no statistically significant difference (p-value >0.05) between them. DREEM subscales scores for both institutions indicated room for improvement at both institutions in all five domains.


CONCLUSION: We concluded that there were no statistically significant differences between first year medical students’ perceptions of their respective institutional educational environment in integrated versus traditional medical curriculum by using DREEM. However, students in integrated medical curriculum perceived their educational environment more positively than their counterparts in traditional medical curriculum.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zahra, T., M. Khan, M. Umer, and H. Zainab. “COMPARISON OF FIRST YEAR MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTIONS REGARDING THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTITUTIONAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN INTEGRATED VS TRADITIONAL MEDICAL CURRICULUM BY USING DREEM INVENTORY”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, Vol. 13, no. 2, June 2021, pp. 97-102, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2021.20920.
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Rania N, Siri A, Bagnasco A, Aleo G, Sasso L. Academic climate, well-being and academic performance in a university degree course. J Nurs Manag 2014;22:751-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2012.01471.x.
2. Gupta S, Jain A, Garg S, Sood S, Kumari B. Perceptions of Indian dental hygiene students toward their profession and its relationship with their explicit self-esteem scores. Indian J Dent 2014;5:202-10. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.144728.
3. Qin Y, Wang Y, Floden RE. The Effect of Problem-Based Learning on Improvement of the Medical Educational Environment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Med Princ Pract 2016;25:525–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000449036.
4. Hammond SM, O’Rourke M, Kelly M, Bennett D, O’Flynn S. A psychometric appraisal of the DREEM. BMC Med Educ 2012;12:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-2.
5. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 1): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education—a unifying perspective. Med Teach 2001;23(4):337-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120063330.
6. Genn JM. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 23 (Part 2): Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education—a unifying perspective. Med Teach 2001;23(5):445–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590120075661.
7. Dent J, Harden R. A Practical Guide for Medical Teachers. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2013.
8. Frenk J, Chen L, Bhutta ZA, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. Lancet December 2010;376(9756):1923-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61854-5.
9. Miles S, Swift L, Leinster SJ. The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM): A review of its adoption and use. Med Teach 2012; 34: e620–34. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668625.
10. James D, Mani S, Mathew A, Velusamy SK. Perceptions of the educational environment at entry and exit of medical students to clinical teaching in a rural medical college. Int J Res Med Sci 2017;5(6):2601-7. https://doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172455.
11. Mogre V, Amalba A. Psychometric properties of the Dundee ready educational environment measure in a sample of Ghanaian medical students. Educ Health 2016;29:16-24. https://doi.org/10.4103/1357-6283.178921.
12. Roff S, McAleer S, Harden R, Al-Qahtani M, Ahmed AU, Deza H, et al. Development and validation of the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). Med Teach 1997; 19(4): 295-9. https://doi.org/10.3109/01421599709034208.
13. Roff S. The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM): A generic instrument for measuring students’ perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula. Med Teach 2005;27(4):322–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590500151054.
14. Soliman MM, Sattar K, Alnassar S, Alsaif F, Alswat K, Alghonaim M, et al. Medical students’ perception of the learning environment at King Saud University Medical College, Saudi Arabia, using DREEM Inventory. Advan Med Educ Pract 2017;8;221–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S127318.
15. Rehman R, Ghias K, Fatima SS, Hussain M, Alam F. Students’ perception of educational environment at Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci 2016;32(3):720-4. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.323.9562.
16. Zawawi AH, Elzubeir M. Using DREEM to compare graduating students’ perceptions of learning environments at medical schools adopting contrasting educational strategies. Med Teach 2012;34(1 Suppl):25–31. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.656747.
17. Creswell JW. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approach 4th Edition. Sage Publications Inc.; 2014.
18. McAleer S, Roff S. A practical guide to using the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM). In J. M. Genn (Ed.), Curriculum, environment, climate, quality and change in medical education: A unifying perspective (pp. 29-33). AMEE Education Guide no. 23. Scotland: AMEE.
19. Al-Hazimi A, Zaini R, Al-Hyiani A, Hassan N, Gunaid A, Ponnamperuma G, et al. Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: A study in four undergraduate medical schools. Educ Health (Abingdon) 2004;17(2):192–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280410001711003.
20. Khan JS, Tabassum S, Yousafzai UK, Mukhtar O. Measuring the medical education environment in undergraduate medical colleges across Punjab, Pakistan. Biomedica 2011;27:14-8.
21. Imran N, Khalid F, Haider, II, Jawaid M, Irfan M, Mahmood A, et al. Student’s perceptions of educational environment across multiple undergraduate medical institutions in Pakistan using DREEM inventory. J Pak Med Assoc 2015;65(1):24-8.
22. Ali K, Raja M, Watson G, Coombes L, Heffernan E. The dental school learning milieu: students’ perceptions at five academic dental institutions in Pakistan. J Dent Edu 2012;76(4):487-94.
23. Brown T, Williams B, Lynch M. The Australian DREEM: evaluating student perceptions of academic learning environments within eight health science courses. Int J Med Educ 2011;2:94–101. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4e66.1b37.
24. Bakhshi H, Bakhshialiabad MH, Hassanshahi GH. Students' perceptions of the educational environment in an Iranian Medical School, as measured by The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull 2014;40:36-41. https://doi.org/10.3329/bmrcb.v40i1.20335.
25. Mahsood N, Jamil B. Student perceptions of educational environment at institute of Public Health and Social Sciences, Khyber Medical University. Adv Health Prof Educ 2015;1(2):60-4.
26. Nadeem A, Iqbal N, Yousaf A, Daud MA, Younis A. Students’ perception of educational environment at Army Medical College, Rawalpindi: assessment by DREEM (Dundee-Ready Education Environment Measure). Pak Armed Forces Med J 2014;64(2):298-303.