Reviewing neuroimaging techniques to measure quantitative cerebral blood flow in healthy children

Main Article Content

Maajid Mohi Ud Din Malik

Abstract

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) is a critical physiological parameter for brain development and function in children. This viewpoint reviews the main neuroimaging techniques for quantifying pediatric CBF, including Positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Computed Tomography Perfusion, arterial spin labelling (ASL) MRI, and Doppler ultrasound. Each modality has strengths and limitations related to radiation exposure, accessibility, resolution, and quantification. Reported average CBF values vary by technique and increase with age, reflecting neurodevelopment. ASL MRI offers a promising non-invasive method without radiation. Standardizing protocols across modalities and ages with validation against PET is needed. Quantitative CBF imaging provides a valuable window into understanding cerebrovascular changes in normal and abnormal neurodevelopment.

Article Details

How to Cite
Malik, Maajid Mohi Ud Din. “Reviewing Neuroimaging Techniques to Measure Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Children”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, vol. 17, no. 1, Mar. 2025, pp. 119-22, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2025.23713.
Section
Viewpoint

References

1. Kozberg M, Hillman E. Neurovascular coupling and energy metabolism in the developing brain. Prog Brain Res 2016;225:213-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.02.002

2. Smyser TA, Smyser CD, Rogers CE, Gillespie SK, Inder TE, Neil JJ. Cortical gray and adjacent white matter demonstrate synchronous maturation in very preterm infants. Cereb Cortex 2016;26(8):3370-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv164

3. Zhao MY, Tong E, Duarte Armindo R, Woodward A, Yeom KW, Moseley ME, et al. Measuring Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow in Healthy Children: A Systematic Review of Neuroimaging Techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2024;59:70-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28758

4. Zhang N, Gordon ML, Goldberg TE. Cerebral blood flow measured by arterial spin labeling MRI at resting state in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017;72:168-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.11.023

5. Yeo RA, Gasparovic C, Merideth F, Ruhl D, Doezema D, Mayer AR. A longitudinal proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of mild traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2011;28(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1578

6. Schoning M, Hartig B. Age dependence of total cerebral blood flow volume from childhood to adulthood. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16(5):827-33. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-199609000-00007

7. Mohammadi-Nejad A-R, Mahmoudzadeh M, Hassanpour MS, Wallois F, Muzik O, Papadelis C, et al. Neonatal brain resting-state functional connectivity imaging modalities, Photoacoustics 2018;10:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacs.2018.01.003

8. Wang J, Licht DJ, Jahng GH, Liu CS, Rubin JT, Haselgrov J, et al. Pediatric perfusion imaging using pulsed arterial spin labeling. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003;18(4):404-13.

9. Del Toro J, Louis PT, Goddard-Finegold J. Cerebrovascular regulation and neonatal brain injury. Pediatr Neurol 1991;7(1):3-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0887-8994(91)90098-6.

10. Guo T, Chau V, Peyvandi S, Latal B, McQuillen PS, Knirsch W, et al. White matter injury in term neonates with congenital heart diseases: Topology & comparison with preterm newborns. NeuroImage 2019;185:742-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.004

Similar Articles

1 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.