EFFECT OF RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS AND ISOLATION ON MENTAL HEALTH OF INFERTILE WOMEN

Main Article Content

Rabia Zonash Mir
Seema Zahid
Saima Ehsan

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of relationship dynamics and isolation on mental health of infertile women.


METHODS: This correlational study was conducted on pregnant women from January 2018 to December 2018. About 150 infertile women in the age range 18 to 50 years were enrolled from selected infertility centers of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Three different scales like Relationship Dynamics Scale (RDS), Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS) and Mental Health Inventory (MHI) were used in this study. Multiple Regression, Pearson Correlation Matrix and T-test were applied on study variables using SPSS v.21.0.


RESULTS: Infertile women with uterus issue are higher on relationship dynamics scale (M= 16.16±3.18), UCLA loneliness scale (M= 50.87±8.80), and on components of mental health inventory e.g., positive affect (M=17.29±3.58). Infertile women with tube issues are higher on MHI, e.g., anxiety (M=18.91±3.47), depression (M=15.58±3.34) and behavioral control (M=17.83±2.55). Linear regression analysis showed significant negative effect of relationship dynamic scale that brought about 32.5% change in anxiety, 4% in depression, 4.4% change in behavior control, and 5.7% change in positive affect which are four major components of mental health (p<.001). Loneliness scale also showed negative effect on components of mental health that brought about 23.4% variance in anxiety, 2.2% in depression, 12.8% in behavior control, and 16.8% in positive among infertile women (p< .001).


CONCLUSION: Infertile women having more relationship dynamics were found to be low on depression, anxiety, behavior control and positive affect. Infertile women facing more isolation have less positive affect and behavior control.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mir, R., S. Zahid, and S. Ehsan. “EFFECT OF RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS AND ISOLATION ON MENTAL HEALTH OF INFERTILE WOMEN”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, Vol. 12, no. 3, Sept. 2020, pp. 238-44, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2020.19655.
Section
Original Articles

References

1. Antle B, Sar B, Christensen D, Karam E, Ellers F, Barbee A, et al. The impact of the within my reach relationship training on relationship skills and outcomes for low-income individuals. J Marital Fam Ther 2013;39(3):346–57. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2012.00314.x.
2. Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness matters: A theoretical and empirical review of consequences and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med 2010; 40(2):218–27. DOI:10.1007/s12160-010-9210-8
3. World Health Organization (WHO). Mental Health Organization. A state of well-being;2019. [Accessed on: August 10, 2019]. Available from URL: https://www.who.int/features/factfiles/mental_health/en/.
4. De-Berardis D, Mazza M, Marini S, Nibletto LD, SerroniN, Pino MC, et al. Psychopathology, emotional aspects and psychological counselling in infertility: a review. Clin Ter 2014;165(3):163-9. DOI: 10.7417/CT.2014.1716.
5. Volgsten H, Svanberg AS, Ekselius L, Lundkvist O, Poromaa IS. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in infertile women and men undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment. Hum Reprod 2008;23(9):2056–63. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/den154.
6. Gurunath S, Pandian Z, Anderson RA, Bhattacharya S. Defining infertility: a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(5):575–88. DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmr015.
7. Sudha G, Reddy KS. Causes of female infertility: a cross sectional study. Int J Latest Res Sci Tech 2013;2(6):119-23.
8. Mascarenhas MN, Flaxman SR, Boerma T, Vanderpoel S, Stevens GA. National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys. Plos Med 2012;9(12):350-56. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356.g005.
9. Cozaru GC, Butnariu LI, Gorduza EV. Genetic counselling in reproductive disorders. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2012; 33(1):213- 17. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.114.
10. Afifi WA, Falato WL, Weiner JL. Identity concerns following a severe relational transgression: The role of discovery method for the relational outcomes of infidelity. J Soc Pers Relat 2001;18(2):291-08. DOI: 10.1177/0265407501182007.
11. Whisman MA, Uebelacker. Comorbidity of relationship distress and mental and physical health problems. In D. K. Snyder and M. A. Whisman (Eds.), Treating difficult couples: Helping clients with coexisting mental and relationship disorders. New York:Guilford Press; 2003. p. 3–26. [Accessed on: August 10, 2019]. Available from URL: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-00013-001.
12. Matthews T, Danese A, Wertz J, Odgers CL, Ambler A, Moffitt TE, et al. Social isolation, loneliness and depression in young adulthood: A behavioural genetic analysis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2016;51(3):339-48. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-016-1178-7.
13. Holley SR, Pasch LA, Bleil ME, Gregorich S, Katz PK, Adler NE. Prevalence and predictors of major depressive disorder for fertility treatment patients and their partners. Fertil Steril 2015;103(5):1332-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.018.
14. Pasch LA, Holley SR, Bleil ME, Shehab D, Katz PP, Adler NE. Addressing the needs of fertility treatment patients and their partners: are they informed of and do they receive mental health services? Fertil Steril 2016;106(1):209-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.03.006.
15. Xu H, Ouyang N, Li R, Tuo P, Mai M, Wang W. The effects of anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilization outcomes of Chinese women. Psychol Health Med 2017;22(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2016.1218031.
16. Lynch CD, Sundaram R, Maisog JM, Sweeney AM, Buck Louis GM. Preconception stress increases the risk of infertility: results from a couple-based prospective cohort study--the LIFE study. Hum Reprod 2014;29(5):1067- 75. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu032.
17. Sejbaek CS, Hageman I, Pinborg A, Hougaard CO, Schmidt L. Incidence of depression and influence of depression on the number of treatment cycles and births in a national cohort of 42 880 women treated with ART. Hum Repro 2013;28(4):1100–9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des442.
18. Hassan S, Khurshid E, Batool B. Psychological distress experienced by women with primary infertility in Pakistan: role of psycho-social and cultural factors. NUST J Soc Scien Human 2015;1(2):56-72.
19. Shaheen R, Subhan S, Sultan S, Subhan K, Tahir S. Prevalence of infertility in a cross section of Pakistani population. Pak J Zoo 2010;42(4);389-93.
20. Sultan S. Marital Discord: The Hidden Burden of Infertility. Pak J Psychol Res 2010;25(1);31-43.
21. Scott S, Markman H. Marriage in the 90s: A nationwide random phone survey. Denver, CO: PREP Inc;1997. [Accessed on: August 10, 2019]. Available from URL: https://healthymarriageandfamilies.org/library-resource/marriage-90s-nationwide-random-phone-survey.
22. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and discriminate validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980;39(3):472-80. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.3.472.
23. Veit CT, Ware JE. The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983;51(5):730-42. DOI: 10.1037//0022-006x.51.5.730.
24. Schwerdtfeger KL, Shreffler KM. Trauma of pregnancy loss and infertility for mothers and involuntarily childless women in the contemporary United States. J Loss Trauma 2009;14(3):211-27. DOI: 10.1080/15325020802537468.
25. Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2018; 20(1): 41-7.
26. Negro-Vilar A. Stress and other environmental factors affecting fertility in men and women: overview. Environ Health Perspect Suppl 1993; 101(2):59-64. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s259.
27. Sami N, Saeed AT, Wasim S, Saleem S. Risk factors for secondary infertility among women in Karachi, Pakistan. PLoS One 2012;7(4):28-35. DOI:10.1371/journal. pone.0035828.