DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SOCIAL COMPARISON SCALE FOR WOMEN WITH INFERTILITY IN PAKISTAN

Article Sidebar

PDF
Published: Sep 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35845/kmuj.2019.18467
Keywords:
Social comparison Scale development Mixed method Varimax rotation Convergent validity Infertility, Female

Main Article Content

Anila Sadaf Mubashir
Department of Psychology, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan
Syeda Shahida Batool
Department of Psychology, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The study was designed to construct a valid and reliable social comparison scale for women with infertility (SCS-WI) in Pakistan.
METHODS: A mixed-method approach with purposive sampling techniques was used to construct the scale. Study duration was 13 months and was set in private and government hospitals and clinics of major cities of four provinces of Pakistan. Factor structure of 37 item with primary infertility was explored through exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on a sample of 215 women with primary infertility with age range from 20-45(Mage= 31.03; SD= 6.18) years. The obtained factor structure of Social Comparison Scale for Women with Infertility (32 items) was further confirmed through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on a sample of 210 women with primary infertility whose ages ranged between 20 years and 45 years (Mage =32.42, SD=5.49).
RESULTS: Principal component analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation method yielded three factors (viz., social distress, emotional burden and personal incapacities) and accounted for 63.37% variance and all 32 items of the scale were retained. The CFA supported the measurement structure of SCS-WI retained after EFA. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.95 (alphas range from .85-.90 for subscales) with sound convergent and divergent validity (r = 0.37, p = 0.05) (r = -0.70, p<0.001) respectively. Test re-test reliability was (r = 0.93, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Social comparison scale for women with infertility is a valid scale with good items homogeneity, internal consistency and a revelatory pattern of validity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mubashir, A. S., and S. S. Batool. “DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF SOCIAL COMPARISON SCALE FOR WOMEN WITH INFERTILITY IN PAKISTAN”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, vol. 11, no. 3, Sept. 2019, pp. 129-39, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2019.18467.
Issue
Vol. 11 No. 3 (2019): KMUJ 2019; VOL 11; ISSUE 3 - JUL - SEP
Section
Original Articles

Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Author Biography

Anila Sadaf Mubashir, Department of Psychology, Government College University, Lahore, Pakistan

PhD Scholar Psychology Department

References

Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Infertility around the globe: New thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century. Hum Reprod Update 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):411-26. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmv0

Jalil T, Muazzam, A. Emotional intelligence as a predictor of marital adjustment to infertility. Int J Res Stud Psychol 2013;2(3): 45-58.

Burns LH, Covington SN, Kempers RD. Infertility counselling. NY: Cambridge University Press; 2006.

Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Dev 1995 Jun; 66(3):710-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.

Alexander LL, Bader H, Garfield S, LaRosa JH. New dimensions in women’s health. 4th ed. Canada: Jones and Bartlett. 2007.

Sami N, Ali TS. Perceptions and experiences of women in Karachi, Pakistan regarding secondary infertility: results from a community-based qualitative study. Obstet Gynecol Int 2012.108756. DOI: 10.1155/2012/108756.

LaRosa J H, Bader H, Alexander W. New dimensions in women's health. Jones & Bartlett Publishers; Aug 3, 2016.

Cousineau TM, Domar AD. Psychological impact of infertility. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2007 Apr 1;21(2):293-308.

Stephen EH, Chandra A. Declining estimates of infertility in the United States: 1982-2002. Fertil Steril 2006 Sep; 86(3):516-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.02.129.

Crick NR, Grotpeter JK. Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Dev 1995 Jun; 66(3):710-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00900.x.

Daar AS, Merali Z. Infertility and social suffering: the case of ART in developing countries. Current practices and controversies in assisted reproduction, 2001.

Joshi H, Singh R, Bindu M. Psychological distress, coping and subjective wellbeing among infertile women. J Indian Acad Appl Psychol 2009;35:329-6.

Allan S, Gilbert P. A Social Comparison Scale: Psychometric properties and relationship to Psychopathology. Pers Indiv Differ 1995;19(3):293-9. DOI: 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00086-L.

Mubashir AS, Batool SS. Development and validation of Submissive Behavior Scale for women with Infertility in Pakistan. Pak J Soc & Clin Psychol 2018; 16,1: 10-17.

Sultan S, Tahir A. Psychological consequences of infertility. Hellenic J Psychol 2011;8: 229-47.

Hays S. The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT: 1996.

King L, Meyer MH. The politics of reproductive benefits: US insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments. Gend Soc 1997 Feb;11(1):8-30.

Burisch M. Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. Am Psychol 1984; 39(3):214-27.

Stevens A, Price J. Evolutionary psychiatry: A new beginning. 1st Edition. New York. Routledge. 2015.

Filed A. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. 2nd Edition. London: Sage Publications Ltd. 2005.

Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analyses. Educ Psychol Meas 1960;20(1):141-51.

McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 2002 Mar;7(1):64-82.

Buunk AP, Groothof HA, Siero FW. Social Comparison and Satisfaction with one’s social life. J Soc Pers Relat 2007 Apr;24(2):197-205. DOI:10.1177/0265407507075410.

Civitci N, Civitci A. Social Comparison Orientation, hardiness and life satisfaction in undergraduate students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2015 Oct 9;205:516-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.09.062.

Frieswijk N, Buunk BP, Steverink N, Slaets JP. The interpretation of social comparison and its relation to life satisfaction among elderly people: Does frailty make a difference? J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2004 Sep;59(5):P250-7. DOI: 10.1093/geronb/59.5.p250.

Diener ED, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin S. The satisfaction with life scale. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

Butt MM. Ghani A. Why I am single? Unpublished BS Hons Thesis. Department of Psychology, GC University, Lahore, 2014.

Dhingra R, Baru A, Gupta K. Comparing subjective wellbeing of fertile and infertile women residing in the same family. Res Human Soc Sci 2014;4(5):2224-5766.

White JB, Langer EJ, Yariv L, Welch JC. Frequent social comparisons and destructive emotions and behaviors: The dark side of social comparisons. J Adult dev 2006 Mar 1;13(1):36-44.

Donkor ES, Sandall J. The impact of perceived stigma and mediating social factors on infertility-related stress among women seeking infertility treatment in Southern Ghana. Soc Sci Med 2007 Oct;65(8):1683-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.06.003.

McQuillan J, Torres Stone RA, Greil AL. Infertility and life satisfaction among women. J Fam Issu 2007;28(7):955-81.

Batool SS, de Visser R O. Psychosocial and Contextual Determinants of Health among Infertile Women: a cross-cultural Study. Psychol Health Med 2014;19(6):673-9. DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2014.880492.