OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of socioeconomic factors
with cigarette smoking and their relative impact on it in male gender
METHODS: This study was based on Pakistan demographic and health
survey data set 2012-13. Bivariate and binary logistic regression analysis
has been carried out to evaluate the impact of cigarette smoking in
male population of Pakistan.
RESULTS: More than two third (71.68%) respondents never smoked
cigarette. Chewing tobacco was commonly (18.6%) used by the respondents.High proportion (34.1%) of respondents consumed eighteen and over cigarettes in 24 hours, whereas the 18% of the respondents consumed twelve to seventeen cigarettes. Age, education, place of residence by province, media access and wealth index were found to be significant with respect to cigarette smoking. Inverse association existed between education and smoking .i.e. respondents with no education had smoked 1.604 times more cigarettes as compared to respondents with higher level of education. The respondents reading newspaper and access to radio had less likely to smoke cigarettes [OR=0.931 and OR=0.80] respectively compared to their counterpart having no access to media. Ever married men belonged to Baluchistan province smoked cigarettes 1.576 times more than their counterparts that lived in GB.
CONCLUSION: Age, education, place of residence by province, media
access particularly newspaper and radio and wealth index were found
having statistically significant impact on cigarette smoking in Pakistani
male gender. These statistical outcomes will serve as guide in smoking
control and management of cigarette smoking.
KEY WORDS: Cigarette Smoking (MeSH); Tobacco Smoking (MeSH);
Male (MeSH); Pakistan (MeSH); Age Groups (MeSH); Education (MeSH).
World Health Organzation. Tobacco: fact
sheet N 339. [Cited on 2015 Feb 22;
. Available from URL: http://www.
Crofton, J. & Simpson, D. (2002). Tobacco:
a global threat, Macmillan.
Health, UDO. & Services, H. (2014). The
health consequences of smoking—50
years of progress: a report of the Surgeon
General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of
Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention, National
Center for Chronic Disease Prevention
and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking
and Health 17.
Ahmed HM, Blaha MJ, Nasir K, Jones
SR, Rivera JJ, Agatston A, et al. Low-risk
lifestyle, coronary calcium, cardiovascular
events, and mortality: results from MESA.
Am J Epidemiol 2013; 178:12-21.
Cramer, DW, Harlow B L, Xu H, Fraer C,
Barbieri R. Cross-sectional and case-controlled
analyses of the association between
smoking and early menopause. Maturitas
Kark JD, Lebiush M, Rannon L. Cigarette
smoking as a risk factor for epidemic a
(h1n1) influenza in young men. New Eng
J Med 1982; 307:1042-6.
Glassman AH, Helzer JE, Covey LS, Cottler
LB, Stetner F, Tipp JE, et al. Smoking,
smoking cessation, and major depression. J
Am Med Assoc 1990; 264: 1546-9.
Kandel DB, Davies M. Adult sequelae
of adolescent depressive symptoms.
Archives Gen Psychiat 1986;43:255-62.
Parrott AC. Does cigarette smoking cause
stress? American Psychologist 1999;
Centers for Disease Control Prevention.
Cigarette smoking among adults--United
States, 1992 and changes in the definition
of current cigarette smoking. MMWR.
Morbidity and mortality weekly report
Zhu BP, Giovino GA, Mowery PD, Eriksen
MP. The relationship between cigarette
smoking and education revisited: implications
for categorizing persons’ educational
status. Am J Public Health 1996;
Centers for Disease Control Prevention.
(1997). Cigarette smoking among adults-
-United States, 1995. MMWR. Morbidity
and mortality weekly report 46, 12-17.
Escobedo LG, Zhu BP, Giovino GA, Eriksen
MP. Educational attainment and racial
differences in cigarette smoking. J Natl
Cancer Inst 1995; 87: 1552-2.
Escobedo LG, Anda, RF, Smith PF, Remington
P L, Mast EE. Sociodemographic
characteristics of cigarette smoking initiation
in the United States: implications
for smoking prevention policy. J Am Med
Assoc 1990 264:1550-5.
Health, U. D. o. & Services, H. Preventing
tobacco use among youth and young
adults: a report of the Surgeon General.
Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health
and Human Services, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, National Center
for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health
Agresti A. (1996). An introduction to categorical
data analysis, 135, Wiley New York.
Hosmer Jr DW, Lemeshow S. (2004).
Applied logistic regression, John Wiley
Ahmad K, Jafary F, Jehan I, Hatcher J,
Khan AQ, Chaturvedi N, et al. Prevalence
and predictors of smoking in Pakistan:
results of the National Health Survey of
Pakistan. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil
Nasir K, Rehan N. Epidemiology of cigarette
smoking in Pakistan. Addiction2001;
Ali S, Sathiakumar N, Delzell E. Prevalence
and socio-demographic factors associated
with tobacco smoking among adult males
in rural Sindh, Pakistan. Southeast Asian J
Trop Med Public Health 2006; 37: 1054.
Barnett JR. Does place of residence matter?
Contextual effects and smoking in
Christchurch. N Z Med J 2000; 113:433-5.
Shah SM, Arif AA, Delclos GL, Khan AR,
Khan A. Prevalence and correlates of
smoking on the roof of the world. Tob
Control 2001; 10:e1-e1.
Hosseinpoor AR, Parker LA, d’Espaignet
ET, Chatterji S. Socioeconomic inequality
in smoking in low-income and middle-income
countries: results from the World
Health Survey. PloS one2012; 7: e42843.
de Looze M, ter Bogt T, Hublet A, Kuntsche
E, Richter M, Zsiros E, Godeau
E, Vollebergh W. Trends in educational
differences in adolescent daily smoking
across Europe, 2002–10. Eur J Public
Smet B, Maes L, De Clercq L, Haryanti K,
Winarno RD. Determinants of smoking
behaviour among adolescents in Semarang,
Indonesia. Tob Control 1999; 8:
Ashan H, Underwood P, Atkinson D.
Smoking among male teenagers in Dhaka.
Bangladesh Prev Med1998; 27: 70-6.
Sinha D, Gupta P, Pednekar M. Tobacco use
among students in the eight North-eastern
states of India. Indian J cancer 2003; 40: 43.
Rani M, Bonu S, Jha P, Nguyen S, Jamjoum
L. Tobacco use in India: prevalence and
predictors of smoking and chewing in a
national cross sectional household survey.
Tob Control 2003; 12: e4-e4.
Memon A, Moody PM, Sugathan TN,
El-Gerges N, Al-Bustan M, Al-Shatti A,
Al-Jazzaf H. Epidemiology of smoking
among Kuwaiti adults: prevalence, characteristics,
and attitudes. Bull World Health
Organ 2000; 78: 1306-15.
French DJ, Jang SN, Tait RJ, Anstey KJ.
Cross-national gender differences in the
socioeconomic factors associated with
smoking in Australia, the United States
of America and South Korea. Int J Public
Health 2013; 58: 345-353.
National Bureau of Economic Research.
(2006). Education and health: evaluating
theories and evidence.
Koning P, Webbink D, Martin NG. The
effect of education on smoking behavior:
new evidence from smoking durations of
a sample of twins. Empirical Economics
Government of Pakistan 2001. Ministry
of Finance: Economic Survey of Pakistan
Alam AY, Iqbal A, Mohamud KB, Laporte
RE, Ahmed A, Nishtar S. Investigating socio-
of tobacco use in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
BMC Public Health 2008;8:50.
Ahsan H, Underwood P, Atkinson D.
Smoking among male teenagers in Dhaka,
Bangladesh. Prev Med 1998; 27: 70-6.
Flynn BS, Worden JK, Bunn JY, Solomon
LJ, Ashikaga T, Connolly SW, et al. Mass
media interventions to reduce youth
smoking prevalence. Am J Prev Med 2010;
Nagelhout GE, den Putte BV, Vries HD,
Crone MR, Fong GT, Willemsen MC. The
influence of newspaper coverage and a
media campaign on smokers’ support
for smoke-free bars and restaurants and
on second-hand smoke harm awareness.
Findings from the International Tobacco
Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. Tob
Control 2011; 21.
Tichenor PJ, Donohue GA, Olien CN.
Mass media flow and differential growth
in knowledge. Public Opin Q 1970;
Food & Drug Administration, H. Regulations
restricting the sale and distribution
of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco to
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.