Assessing empathy levels in postgraduate students of pathology: a cross-sectional study
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To assess empathy scores among postgraduate students enrolled in the M. Phil programs of various Pathology disciplines at Khyber Medical University (KMU) Peshawar, Pakistan.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Institute of Pathology and Diagnostic Medicine, KMU, Peshawar, Pakistan, between March and October 2023. A total of 48 students from M. Phil Histopathology, Hematology, Oral Pathology, and Microbiology were enrolled through consecutive sampling. Participants completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy – Health Professions Student (JSE-HPS) questionnaire. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded, and data were analyzed using SPSS v.26.
Results: Out of 48 students, 43 completed the questionnaire (response rate: 89.5%). Of these, 15 (34.9%) were males and 28 (65.1%) females; 51.2% held MBBS/BDS degrees and 48.8% were from Allied Health Sciences. The mean JSE score was 92.9 ± 9.2, with a median of 93.0. Subscale means for perspective-taking, compassionate care, and walking in patients’ shoes were 54.1±6.4, 35.5±6.3, and 7.4±2.5, respectively. Empathy scores showed no statistically significant association with gender, age group, academic qualification, M. Phil specialization, prior clinical experience, or level of seniority. Median scores reflected a similar pattern, with slightly higher empathy noted among males, Allied Health graduates, and those without prior clinical exposure, though none reached statistical significance.
Conclusion: Empathy scores among M. Phil students in pathology disciplines were modest and showed no significant association with demographic or educational variables. Compared to international literature, the overall empathy levels appear lower, highlighting the need for enhanced focus on empathy development in postgraduate pathology education
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online
(e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
1. Hojat M, Vergare M, Isenberg G, Cohen M, Spandorfer J. Underlying construct of empathy, optimism, and burnout in medical students. Int J Med Educ 2015;6:12. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.54c3.60cd
2. McDaniel MA, Einstein GO. Training learning strategies to promote self-regulation and transfer: The knowledge, belief, commitment, and planning framework. Perspect Psychol Sci 2020;15(6):1363-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620920723
3. Samarasekera DD, Lee SS, Yeo JH, Yeo SP, Ponnamperuma G. Empathy in health professions education: What works, gaps and areas for improvement. Med Educ 2023;57(1):86-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.1486
4. Howick J, Steinkopf L, Ulyte A, Roberts N, Meissner K. How empathic is your healthcare practitioner? A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient surveys. BMC Med Educ 2017;17:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0967-3
5. Rashid Z, Sharif I, Khushk IA, Raja AA. Evaluation of empathy and fatigue among physicians and surgeons in tertiary care hospitals of Rawalpindi. Pak J Med Sci 2021;37(3):663. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.1973
6. Levinson W, Hudak PL, Tricco AC. A systematic review of surgeon-patient communication: strengths and opportunities for improvement. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93(1):3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.03.023
7. Dehning S, Reiß E, Krause D, Gasperi S, Meyer S, Dargel S, et al. Empathy in high-tech and high-touch medicine. Patient Educ Couns 2014;95(2):259-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.01.013
8. Orth M, Averina M, Chatzipanagiotou S, Faure G, Haushofer A, Kusec V, et al. Opinion: redefining the role of the physician in laboratory medicine in the context of emerging technologies, personalised medicine and patient autonomy (‘4P medicine’). J Clin Pathol 2019;72(3):191-7. https://doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204734
9. Moudatsou M, Stavropoulou A, Philalithis A, Koukouli S. The role of empathy in health and social care professionals. Healthcare 2020:8(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010026
10. Bhagwat S, Pai SA. Medical ethics in laboratory medicine: A review, with an oath for pathologists. Indian J Med Ethics 2020;V(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2020.02
11. Zhang X, Li L, Zhang Q, Le LH, Wu Y. Physician Empathy in Doctor-Patient Communication: A Systematic Review. Health Commun 2023:1-11. 10.1080/10410236.2023.2201735
12. Lapedis CJ, Kroll-Wheeler L, DeJonckheere M, Johnston D, Owens SR. Broadening the scope: a qualitative study of pathologists’ attitudes toward patient-pathologist interactions. Am J Clin Pathol 2021;156(6):969-79. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqab044
13. Walker PC, Marshall VD, Sweet BV, Vordenberg SE. Longitudinal Measurement of Empathy in Student Pharmacists. Am J Pharm Educ 2022;86(7):8752. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8752
14. Ameh PO, Uti OG, Daramola OO. Empathy among dental students in a Nigerian institution. Eur J Dent Educ 2019;23(2):135-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.12412
15. Detsomboonrat P, Theppanich S, Banyen S, Hongviphat S, Khamnil Y, Lapauthaya K, et al. Empathy level towards patients among thai dental students: a cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 2023;23(1):184. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02891-6
16. Williams B, Brown T, McKenna L, Boyle MJ, Palermo C, Nestel D, et al. Empathy levels among health professional students: a cross-sectional study at two universities in Australia. Adv Med Educ Pract 2014;5:107-13. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S57569
17. Nazir M, Alhareky M, Alqahtani A, Alsulaimi L, Alotaibi R, Yousef N, et al. Measuring Empathy among Dental Students and Interns: A Cross-Sectional Study from Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Int J Dent 2021;2021:5584423. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5584423
18. Javed MQ. The evaluation of empathy level of undergraduate dental students in Pakistan: a cross-sectional study. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2019;31(3):402-6.
19. Mirani SH, Shaikh NA, Tahir A. Assessment of Clinical Empathy Among Medical Students Using the Jefferson Scale of Empathy - Student Version. Cureus 2019;11(2):e4160. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4160
20. Tariq N, Rasheed T, Tavakol M. A quantitative study of empathy in Pakistani medical students: a multicentered approach. J Prim Care Community Health 2017;8:294-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131917716233
21. Shaheen A, Mahmood MA, Zia-ul-Miraj M, Ahmad M. Empathy levels among undergraduate medical students in Pakistan, a cross sectional study using Jefferson scale of physician empathy. J Pak Med Assoc 2020;70(7):1149-53. https://doi.org/10.5455/JPMA.301593
22. Tariq N, Tayyab A, Jaffery T. Differences in empathy levels of medical students based on gender, year of medical school and career choice. J Coll Phys Surg Pak 2018;28(4):310-3. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2018.04.310
23. Rashid Z, Sharif I, Khushk IA, Raja AA. Evaluation of empathy and fatigue among physicians and surgeons in tertiary care hospitals of Rawalpindi. Pak J Med Sci 2021;37:663-7. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.37.3.1973
24. Chopik WJ, O’’Brien E, Konrath SH. Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries. J Cross-Cult Psychol 2017;48(1):23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116673910
25. Manstead ASR. The psychology of social class: How socioeconomic status impacts thought, feelings, and behaviour. Br J Soc Psychol 2018;57(2):267-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12251
26. Hojat M. Empathy in health professions education and patient care. Springer International, New York, USA. 2016. ISBN: 978-3319801896.
27. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Veloksi JJ, Magee M. The Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Acad Med 2002;77(10 Suppl):S58-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200210001-00019
28. Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, Mangione S, Vergare M, Magee M. Physician empathy: definition, components, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty. Am J Psychiatry 2002;159(9):1563-9. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.9.1563
29. Fjortoft N, Van Winkle LJ, Hojat M. Measuring empathy in pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ 2011;75(6):109. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe756109
30. Pang C, Li W, Zhou Y, Gao T, Han S. Are women more empathetic than men? Questionnaire and EEG estimations of sex/gender differences in empathic ability. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2023;18(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsad008
31. Chen D, Lew R, Hershman W, Orlander J. A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22(10):1434-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x
32. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, Brainard G, Herrine SK, Isenberg GA, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182-91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55
33. Lieu TA, Schroeder SA, Altman DF. Specialty choices at one medical school: recent trends and analysis of predictive factors. Acad Med. 1989;64(10):622-9.
34. Ward J, Schaal M, Sullivan J, Bowen ME, Erdmann JB, Hojat M. Reliability and validity of the Jefferson Scale of Empathy in undergraduate nursing students. J Nurs Meas 2009;17(1):73-88. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.17.1.73
35. Fields SK, Mahan P, Tillman P, Harris J, Maxwell K, Hojat M. Measuring empathy in healthcare profession students using the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy: health provider--student version. J Interprof Care 2011;25(4):287-93. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2011.566648