ERGONOMICS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE: CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY AMONG PAKISTANI OPHTHALMOLOGISTS

Main Article Content

Asima Rafique
Muhammad Shaheer
Ummara Rasheed

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the ergonomic practices and prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms among Pakistani ophthalmologists.


METHODS: This cross-sectional questionnaire-based study was conducted at College of Ophthalmology and Allied Vision Sciences/Eye Unit III (King Edward Medical University), Lahore, Pakistan from 01-03-2021 to 31-08-2021. A web-based close ended questionnaire (Google form) was developed consisting of questions related to posture in out-patient and operating room in addition to questions related to musculoskeletal symptoms, their effect on routine practice, management. Questionnaire was circulated via a social media application (WhatsApp) to ophthalmologists across Pakistan. Ophthalmologists at various levels of healthcare were included in study. One hundred and seven ophthalmologists consented to part of study and recorded their responses in questionnaire which were then evaluated.


RESULTS: Twenty (18.7%) of the participants were diagnosed as having musculoskeletal disorders. Lower back pain was the main symptom in 39 (36.4%) survey responders while 38 (35.5%) of them reported decreased clinical productivity owing to symptoms. Twenty-five (23.36%) participants had to modify their OPD activity owing to development of musculoskeletal symptoms (p<0.01). Majority of those diagnosed with musculoskeletal symptoms adopted neutral spine postures (ergonomically safe) during work hours as compared to those who were not diagnosed with similar disease (p>0.05). Participants who spent ≥6 hours in operation theatre at a stretch were more prone to develop musculoskeletal symptoms (p=0.013).


CONCLUSION: Majority of participants experienced musculoskeletal symptoms related to work necessitating the need for change in work place practices focusing on maintaining a neutral spine posture.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rafique, A., M. Shaheer, and U. Rasheed. “ERGONOMICS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY PRACTICE: CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY AMONG PAKISTANI OPHTHALMOLOGISTS”. KHYBER MEDICAL UNIVERSITY JOURNAL, vol. 14, no. 2, June 2022, pp. 110-15, doi:10.35845/kmuj.2022.22259.
Section
Original Articles

References

- Fellander-Tsai L. AI ethics, accountability, and sustainability: revisiting the Hippocratic oath. Act Orthop 2020;91(1):1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2019.1682850

- Patti MG, Schlottmann F, Sarr MG. The problem of burnout among surgeons. JAMA Surg 2018;153(5):403-4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0047

- Capone AC, Parikh PM, Gatti ME, Davidson BJ, Davison SP. Occupational injury in plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(5):1555-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3181d62a94

- Soueid A, Oudit D, Thiagarajah S, Laitung G. The pain of surgery: pain experienced by surgeons while operating. Int J Surg 2010;8(2):118-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.11.008

- Sivak-Callcott JA, Diaz SR, Ducatman AM, Rosen CL, Nimbarte AD, Sedgeman JA. A survey study of occupational pain and injury in ophthalmic plastic surgeons. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;27(1):28-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0b013e3181e99cc8

- Vaisbuch Y, Aaron KA, Moore JM, Vaughn J, Ma Y, Gupta R, et al. Ergonomic hazards in otolaryngology. Laryngoscope 2019;129(2):370-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27496.

- International Ergonomics Association. Definition and domains of ergonomics. Accessed on: September 30, 2021. Available from URL: https://iea.cc/

- Kadir BA, Broberg O, Conceicao CSD. Current research and future perspectives on human factors and ergonomics in industry 4.0. Comput Ind Eng 2019;137:1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106004

- Diaconita V, Uhlman K, Mao A, Mather R. Survey of occupational musculoskeletal pain and injury in Canadian ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol 2019;54(3):314-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2018.06.021

- Schechet SA, DeVience E, DeVience S, Shukla S, Kaleem M. Survey of musculoskeletal disorders among US ophthalmologists. Digit J Ophthalmol 2020;26(4):36-45. https://doi.org/10.5693/djo.01.2020.02.001

- Shaw C, Bourkiza R, Wickham H, Mccarthy I, McKechnie C. Mechanical exposure of ophthalmic surgeons: a quantative ergonomic evaluation of indirect ophthalmoscopy and slit lamp bimicroscopy. Can J Ophthalmol 2017;52(3):302-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjo.2016.09.011

- Venkatesh R, Kumar S. Back pain in Ophthalmology: National survey of Indian ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65(8):678-82. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_344_17

- Al-Juhani MA, Khandekar R, Al-Harby M, Al-Hassan A, Edward DP. Neck and upper back pain among eye care professionals. Occup Med (Lond) 2015;65(9):753-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv132

- Hyer JN, Lee RM, Chowdhury HR, Smith HB, Dhital A, Khandwala M. National survey of back and neck pain amongst consultant ophthalmologists in the United Kingdom. Int Ophtalmol 2015;35(6):769-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-015-0036-z

- Kherani F, Kherani A, Sanders E, Bellen L. Canadian ophthalmic practitioners ergonomic (COPE) study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2018;59(9):4157.

- Kaup S, Shivalli S, Kulkarni U, Arunachalam C. Ergonomic practices and musculoskeletal disorders among ophthalmologists in India: An online appraisal. Eur J Ophthalmol 2020;30(1):196-200.

- Honavar SG. Head up, Heels down, posture perfect: Ergonomics for an ophthalmologist. Indian J Ophthalmol 2017;65(8):647-50. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.ijo_711_17

- Sivak-Callcott JA, Diaz SR, Ducatman AM, Rosen CL, Nimbarte AD, Sadgeman JA. A survey study of occupational pain and injury in ophthalmic plastic surgeons. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2011;27(1):28-32. https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0b013e3181e99cc8

- Chams H, Mohammadi SF, Moayyeri A. Frequency and assortment of self-report occupational complaints among Iranian ophthalmologists: a preliminary study. MedGenMed 2004;6(4):1.

- Dhimitri KC, McGwin Jr G, McNeal SF, Lee P, Morse PA, Patterson M, et al. Symptoms of musculoskeletal disorders in ophthalmologists. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;139(1):179-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2004.06.091