Main Article Content
The article had not been previously published by any journal as such, rather it was found online on a file sharing website Scribd as “open access”. When requested by the editor for an explanation, the author maintained that the article had not been “published” by any journal as such and the online upload was from author’s personal account on that file sharing website. When investigated further, the copyrights of the online document were also found exclusively with the author rather than being transferred to the website. The editor was not satisfied by this explanation and rejected the manuscript accusing the authors of possible self- plagiarism and redundant publication. Who was wrong - although the editor may well be correct in rejecting the article but can he/she accuse the author of self-plagiarism in this case?
Work published in KMUJ is licensed under a
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
Roig M. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism: What every author should know. Biochemia Medica 2010;20(3):295-300.
OSA Board of Editors T. From the board of editors: on plagiarism. Opt Mater Express 2013 Feb 1;3(2):307-8.
Leopold SS. Duplicate submission and dual publication: what is so wrong with them? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013 May;471(5):1401.
Possible self-plagiarism and/or prior publication. Committee on Publication Ethics. Case 14-10. [Cited on July 05, 2017]. Available from URL: https://publicationethics.org/case/possible-self-plagiarism-andor-prior-publication